<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing personalization tips and pitfalls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://responsiblemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/24/marketing-personalization-tips-and-pitfalls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://responsiblemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/24/marketing-personalization-tips-and-pitfalls?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=marketing-personalization-tips-and-pitfalls</link>
	<description>where commerce and conscience come together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:03:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://responsiblemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/24/marketing-personalization-tips-and-pitfalls/comment-page-1#comment-1993</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://responsiblemarketing.com/blog/?p=595#comment-1993</guid>
		<description>Personalization is only as good as your database. I get a lot of incorrect mail to &quot;Ms. Shel Horowitz,&quot; or worse, variations like Hortwiz, Morowitz, etc. Yeah, this really makes me believe this company knows me, riiiiight.

Years ago, I was part of an org called Dance Spree. We got a lot of amusement from the mass-mailed envelopes that said &quot;D. Spree&quot; has won $ 1million.&quot;

Deception just doesn&#039;t work. Properly used, however, personalization does work.

--Shel Horowitz, award-winning author of Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personalization is only as good as your database. I get a lot of incorrect mail to &#8220;Ms. Shel Horowitz,&#8221; or worse, variations like Hortwiz, Morowitz, etc. Yeah, this really makes me believe this company knows me, riiiiight.</p>
<p>Years ago, I was part of an org called Dance Spree. We got a lot of amusement from the mass-mailed envelopes that said &#8220;D. Spree&#8221; has won $ 1million.&#8221;</p>
<p>Deception just doesn&#8217;t work. Properly used, however, personalization does work.</p>
<p>&#8211;Shel Horowitz, award-winning author of Principled Profit: Marketing That Puts People First</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://responsiblemarketing.com/blog/2008/09/24/marketing-personalization-tips-and-pitfalls/comment-page-1#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://responsiblemarketing.com/blog/?p=595#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting topic, Patrick, that I think continues to resurface in my work with clients on a regular basis. Whether it&#039;s creating a one-to-one e-marketing strategy or a mobile advertising strategy, I find myself always coming back to this premise: personal, but not creepy. 

With behavioral, attitudinal, and contextual data more available to marketing teams, it&#039;s all to easy to blur the lines from helpful to super creepy. (You know, every marketing exec I&#039;ve talked to about mobile brings up the &quot;wouldn&#039;t it be great if you walked by X and we could send an offer about Y right to their phone?&quot; That&#039;s creepy.)

To avoid such an utter lack of privacy and disconnect with the real world, I always recommend my clients find what&#039;s most valuable to their customers in the context of their brand. Use research to discover how their customers accomplish everyday goals, tasks, and needs with/around/through the company&#039;s product(s). (I find this type of data usually comes from observational research, like contextual inquiry, and less from--arguably meaningless--focus groups.) 

Then, with that knowledge, one can provide content that connects customer value with corporate brand in a context that&#039;s meaningful, and well, not creepy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting topic, Patrick, that I think continues to resurface in my work with clients on a regular basis. Whether it&#8217;s creating a one-to-one e-marketing strategy or a mobile advertising strategy, I find myself always coming back to this premise: personal, but not creepy. </p>
<p>With behavioral, attitudinal, and contextual data more available to marketing teams, it&#8217;s all to easy to blur the lines from helpful to super creepy. (You know, every marketing exec I&#8217;ve talked to about mobile brings up the &#8220;wouldn&#8217;t it be great if you walked by X and we could send an offer about Y right to their phone?&#8221; That&#8217;s creepy.)</p>
<p>To avoid such an utter lack of privacy and disconnect with the real world, I always recommend my clients find what&#8217;s most valuable to their customers in the context of their brand. Use research to discover how their customers accomplish everyday goals, tasks, and needs with/around/through the company&#8217;s product(s). (I find this type of data usually comes from observational research, like contextual inquiry, and less from&#8211;arguably meaningless&#8211;focus groups.) </p>
<p>Then, with that knowledge, one can provide content that connects customer value with corporate brand in a context that&#8217;s meaningful, and well, not creepy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

