Archive for the ‘execution responsible’ Category

The 7 Keys to Responsible Marketing in 2 Minutes

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

Want to know what Responsible Marketing is about but don’t have the time to read our white paper on the topic?

Well, here’s “The 7 Keys to Responsible Marketing in 2 Minutes,” featuring the characters you’ve grown to love (or hate) in our Responsible Marketing web shorts.


View on YouTube

There ya go—with a video that short, now everyone has time to learn about Responsible Marketing. Share away. :)

Subscribe to this feed.

Chocolate covered grasshoppers get people talking

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

Yesterday, I received a lumpy mailer from a company I’d never heard of. Normally I give unsolicited mail about the same amount of consideration you probably do—a few seconds.

But since it was, well, lumpy, and delivered via FedEx I opened it. Here’s what I found:

chocolate-covered-grasshoppers

On one side, it says “Yes, these are real grasshoppers. They’ve even been approved by the FDA of Thailand.”

On the other side:

You’re a risk-taker, a dream-realizer. What’s left to do that you haven’t already done? Eat a grasshopper. They’re farm raised, covered in chocolate and rich in protein. So, not only will you be breaking boundaries, but you’ll be eating healthy, too.

The attached tag included the call to action:

Entrepreneurs can change the world.
Join the movement now!
www.grasshopper.com/idea

I really didn’t have the time, but I couldn’t resist jumping on this to learn what it was all about. The URL takes you to a page with the following video:

As it turns out, Grasshopper offers a nicely-packaged virtual PBX service for businesses. It’s a direct competitor to Grand Central, a similar service recently purchased by Google that’s locked down while Google integrates it into their systems.

Five things I loved about this campaign

  1. The FedEx package made it feel urgent without using deceptive “Urgent – Open Immediately” language. This is message responsible.
  2. Lumpy mail gets opened.
  3. This is textbook example of how to do a word of mouth campaign. Chocolate covered grasshoppers? I had to share this with colleagues and with you.
  4. A little mystery goes a long way. There was no sales copy—just a creative idea and a URL to learn more. Irresistible.
  5. The landing page made it easy to share the video on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and and a host of other sites using an AddThis widget.

And the three things I didn’t love

  1. Each tag was numbered, X of 5,000, and I understand after doing some research for this post that Grasshopper sent these packages to the people they deemed the 5,000 most influential people in America. Very flattering. But at first I thought I might need this code when I logged onto the website. Not so. This is not a limited edition keepsake, it’s a marketing piece. And by letting me know there were so many produced, it made me feel less special—at least initially.
  2. The moving-text style video that was so fresh and interesting a year ago is beginning to get tired. I still like it, but it would seem every ‘movement’ has a video like this associated with it.
  3. Which brings me to the whole ‘movement’ thing. I like to be inspired as much as the next entrepreneur, but I’m approaching my ‘movement’ saturation point. How many movements can one person truly join?

Still, Grasshopper has succeeded where most fail. In one fell swoop, they got my attention, held it, and they got me talking. And though I don’t need their service, If I did, I’d consider them.

So, what do you think of Grasshopper’s campaign?

Would you eat a chocolate covered grasshopper? (I won’t)

But if you’d like to try one, contact me and we’ll make it happen. I’ll post a video of you eating one here and you’ll be famous.

El Pollo Loco adds heat to KFC challenge

Monday, May 11th, 2009

One way or the other, you probably heard about KFC last week.

If you didn’t see one of their ads for their new Kentucky Grilled Chicken (the largest ad blitz in KFC history) you probably heard about the Oprah catastrophy. KFC was caught off guard when a promotion for a free two-piece meal featuring its new grilled chicken created such an overwhelming response the company ran out of chicken and customers had to be turned away.

KFC wasn’t execution responsible, but most companies would love to be overwhelmed by new customers. Especially El Pollo Loco, the 418-unit Costa Mesa, California-based chain that challenged KFC to a taste test in late April.

The company wants to pit its citrus-marinated grilled chicken against the KFC offering and has taken specific aim at KFC’s cooking process. While El Pollo Loco grills its chicken over an open flame, KFC’s chicken is cooked on a griddle—a point that the smaller contender hasn’t missed:

In KFC’s defense, if El Pollo Loco wants a taste test, all they have to do is conduct one, and by definition, grilling doesn’t require an open flame.

Amid the Oprah firestorm, KFC issued rain checks for anyone that was turned away. The rain checks were good until May 19, 2009—excluding Mother’s Day, May 10, 2009.

El Pollo Loco’s response: Ask KFC what they have against mothers, and honor KFC’s coupons on Mother’s Day.

In this David v. Goliath story, Goliath has yet to throw a swing.

It’s familiar territory for KFC—the company has failed to effectively respond to PETA’s long-running Kentucky Fried Cruelty campaign.

El Pollo Loco is receiving national attention playing chicken with KFC.

Do you love their tactics or hate them?

Should KFC accept El Pollo Loco’s challenge?

If not, how should they respond?

. . .

UPDATE: QSRWeb, an online publication covering quick-service restaurant ideas and trends, covered this topic in detail, interviewing me for the Responsible Marketing take in El Polo Loco winning this round of chicken war. Check it out.

Subscribe to this feed.

. . .

Thanks for Matthew Mason for the KFC tip.

Responsible or not? Using the dead to sell

Tuesday, December 30th, 2008

On Christmas Day, John Lennon returned from the dead.

Well, his image and voice were resurrected to help the One Laptop Per Child Foundation “OLPCF” and it’s raised a few eyebrows (and hackles).

If you haven’t heard about the OLPCF, here’s a summary:

It’s an education project, not a laptop project. Inexpensive, durable, networked laptops are important to better education everywhere in the world, empowering children and communities, and sharing access to modern skills with every child on the planet.

And a short video:


View OLPCF Mission on YouTube

It’s an ambitious and noble cause and an idea that’s easy to support.

So Yoko Ono granted the OLPCF the rights to use John Lennon in the following ad, released on December 25:


View A message from John Lennon on YouTube

“John Lennon’s vision of a better world aligns perfectly with the mission of One Laptop per Child,” says Nicholas Negroponte, founder of the OLPC.

But his opinion isn’t shared by all. An article in Ad Age sums it up well:

Still, the ads have mostly been polarizing. Comments at the YouTube page where the ad has been posted by the foundation range from “It’s a good message, but this is too far” to “This is an abomination.” Writers on the popular website Boing Boing said, “Resurrecting the dead to shill modern products is not going to catch on,” adding, “Digitally, it’s creepy.”

Bill Boyd puts it this way:

I always view the use of images of dead celebrities—digitally enhanced or created from scratch—as irresponsible. They’re simply not here to let us know whether they’d approve.

To me, it’s partly about casting responsibility. I couldn’t see Marilyn Monroe, John Wayne or W.C. Fields saying this. But John Lennon feels like a nice fit.

But what do you think?

Do you view this as an innovative and eye-catching way to get attention?

Or is using the dead immoral and just plain wrong?

Comment below to share.

Subscribe to this feed.

Hey Chase! Leo Burnett doesn’t work here.

Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008

We’ve all received direct mail that has our name, title and even gender wrong—the result of poor data integrity, database management, a hiccup at the mail house or any number of things that can happen along the way.

It happens.

But sometimes something lands in our mailbox that’s a real head-scratcher, like this:

Leo Burnett at Outsource Marketing

Leo Burnett was a titan in the ad business for six decades. His agency is responsible for Toucan Sam, The Jolly Green Giant, the Pillsbury Doughboy, Charlie the Tuna, Morris the Cat, Tony the Tiger, and yes—The Marlboro Man.

Leo Burnett by Yousef Karsh/Retna - Time 100

Outsource Marketing opened its doors in 1997—26 years after Leo Burnett died. I turned five in 1971, so I doubt our paths ever crossed. Besides, I never could have talked him into dumping Marlboro or leaving Chicagoland.

I don’t know if Chase had bad data, if there was a database glitch or if there was a problem at the mailing house.

I do know two things:

First, direct marketing has made huge strides in recent years, but execution breakdowns like this still happen far too often.

And second, with the purchase of Washington Mutual (may they rest in peace), Chase has all our company contact info and transaction data. If they wanted to get it right, they could have.

So, what do you think went wrong with this mailing?

And what’s the oddest direct mail screw-up you’ve seen?

Subscribe to this feed.

. . .

Photo: Leo Burnett by Yousef Karsh/Retna – Time 100

Is Whistler-Blackcomb email marketing responsible?

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

On Monday, I received a message from Whistler Blackcomb to inform me of the open dates for each of the mountains.

I don’t recall signing up to receive these notifications, but I was there last season and might have provided my email address somewhere to someone.

No matter. I didn’t mind receiving the message, and I didn’t consider it spam.

As one of the top ski areas in the world and host to the 2010 Winter Olympics, Whistler Blackcomb is a premium brand you can trust.

I figured I could unsubscribe from the notification and I’d be done. Here’s the screen I received when I did:

Whistler Blackcomb email marketing opt-out form

I assumed the section that “Option 1″ in red was the area I was supposed to use to remove myself from their mailing list. But “Option 2″ listed seven other possible lists.

This raised a number of questions for me:

  • Did they add me to every email list they have? If they did, it was without my permission and they’ve become spammers. I don’t think that’s the case since this is the only message I’ve received.
  • Is it possible this simply shows I’m not subscribed to any of their lists?
  • Was this actually an opt-in form?
  • Or, is this is just a poorly thought out and designed email opt-out form? From a usability standpoint, I don’t know what to do with it, and I know a thing or two about web usability.
  • I’m not sure what they are guilty of, but I do know this isn’t what I’d expect from Whistler Blackcomb. They can do better.

    So, do you believe Whistler-Blackcomb’s email marketing efforts are responsible or not?

    Comment below to share your thoughts.

    Subscribe to this feed.

    Can you market as well as a state agency?

    Wednesday, November 12th, 2008

    Some of the best marketing today is being done by groups typically considered boring and safe.

    You know—state agencies.

    Battling preconceptions to market employment office services to employers

    A few years back, Outsource Marketing helped a consortium of seven U.S. states whose charter was to find effective new ways to market state one-stop services to employers. “One-stops” is the name used to describe state employment offices.

    I know. Sounds like a yawner, but it wasn’t. At all.

    Here’s a collage of selected images from the campaign:

    U.S. Dept. of Labor - NBEC - Samples from WorkSource Washington
    +enlarge

    The superhero theme was unique at the time, and it helped us battle the incorrect preconception that all state employees are disinterested paper pushers.

    To the contrary, focus groups and surveys of business owners and managers in all seven states told us business reps at these state agencies were entrepreneurial, engaged, and super to have around.

    The campaign results were quite good, and we documented our findings to help create a marketing template for state employment offices nationwide.

    A fully integrated stop-smoking campaign

    A new stop smoking campaign targeted primarily to young adults from The Colorado State Tobacco Education and Prevention partnership is particularly well done:


    View this video on Vimeo

    The Cigarette is Dead offers an interactive timeline where site visitors can mark the moment when tobacco became either physically, personally, politically, socially dead to them. The personal stories made up of text or video range from the moving to the mundane, and are worth a look.

    This is an integrated effort and ads are seemingly everywhere and their messaging is on murals, billboards, bus shelters, huge outdoor banners, projected on highly visible buildings and spray painted on side walks:

    Some might argue marketing the environment, AIDS prevention, child abuse, etc. is easy. It’s not like marketing a professional service, a product for businesses or a consumer product.

    I’d argue that, while true, that’s a bit of a cop out.

    Sure, this campaign is works because of its message, but it is good for a number of other reasons:

  • It’s clear they worked from a plan and thought through the details
  • They invested in stunning creative
  • They didn’t ‘play it safe’
  • They used many of the new media tools available
  • Creating word of mouth and engagement were obviously a top priority
  • Remember, this isn’t a funded Silicon Valley startup. This mini-movement was supported by the Colorado state health department.

    So, can you market as well as a state agency? Why or why not?

    And have you seen other state agencies do marketing well?

    Comment below to share.

    Subscribe to this feed.

    10 marketing mistakes to avoid now

    Monday, September 29th, 2008

    10 marketing mistakes to avoid now

    The financial crisis has everyone on edge, myself included. I lost my bank, and I’m not sure who’s next. Should I put my money in coffee cans and bury it in the backyard?

    When people are on edge, sometimes they do things they normally wouldn’t do.

    Same goes for businesses.

    Here are a 10 things companies often do in an economic downturn, and why they are a bad idea—especially now.

    1. Cut the marketing budget
      Marketing is one of the essential ingredients that makes companies go. In a less volatile economy, if you defer marketing you simply defer growth. But in a market where consumers and businesses are cutting back spending, you need to maintain—if not expand—your marketing.

      Think about it: Times are tough, so people are reducing spending. If you cut your marketing spend, think they’ll spend more?

      Nope.

      For some companies, this is the beginning of a death spiral they can’t recover from.

      Another reason to market in a poor economy: Less competition—see above.

    2. Cut corners in customer service
      Actually, you need to pay even greater attention to your customers. They are under pressure too, and will make changes quickly if you give them the reason.

      For many companies, the number one source for new business is word of mouth and referral.

      Poor customer service will turn that asset into a liability when your customers quit saying nice things—and start telling the world how good you used to be.

      Your customers are the lifeblood of your company—treat them well now, and they’ll reward you later.

    3. Sell customer information
      Your customer contact, demographic and transactional data has real value to other related and non-competing companies.

      Even if you have informed your customers you might do this, it’s a practice few consumers appreciate. You are betraying your customer’s trust, and destroying a permission asset that’s worth more than everything else in your company.

    4. “Break through” at all costs
      You need great creative to break though the clutter. But some companies will take it too far—create advertising that’s lewder, cruder, louder or more in-your-face—and go completely off brand in the process.

      This doesn’t need to be defined further—you’ll know it when you see it.

    5. Skip the strategy
      Developing quick and dirty marketing materials to pursue new business, without out any research, strategy or planning.

      You’ll have materials filled with marketing puffery instead of relevant messaging powered by consumer insights.

    6. Go cheap
      Using a lowest-cost-provider for printing, design, copywriting and more. You’ll get what you pay for—if you are lucky. You’ll probably get less.

      Also, if your company sponsors worthy non-profits, don’t be so quick to cut your support. These groups are hit hardest when the economy tanks.

    7. Use “situational ethics”
      By pursuing a customer that might normally be a conflict, spamming an “opt-in” list without complete certainty regarding its origins are authenticity—or worse.

      Sooner or later, this will come back to bite you.

    8. Fire the CMO, Marketing Director, or Marketing Manager
      Turnover in the marketing profession is already horrendous.

      The average CMO is lucky to last two years.

      The truth is, strategic marketing takes time and the folks in these positions often aren’t given enough time to succeed.

    9. Agency hop
      Marketing firms and agencies that aren’t performing don’t deserve your business. But often, they get the heave-ho for the wrong reasons.

      It takes time to build a relationship with a marketing firm. Do all you can to make sure you are treating the relationship as a partnership and doing your part to make it work.

    10. Look for a silver bullet
      Sorry, but there isn’t one.

      Advertising alone won’t do it.

      Neither will PR.

      Same goes for Direct Marketing, social media or online marketing.

      Marketing is an ongoing process, not a single action—in a good economy or bad.

    Do you agree or disagree with any of the mistakes on the list?

    Have anything to add?

    Comment below to weigh in.

    Subscribe to this feed.

    Bumvertising: Welcome to the Hall of Shame

    Tuesday, September 16th, 2008

    Bumvertising is exactly what it sounds like: Advertising on the homeless.

    It started in 2005 when 22-year-old University of Washington grad Ben Rogovy was looking for a cheap way to promote another company he started.

    Here’s a quick overview:


    View this video on YouTube

    The Bumvertising debate has attracted local, national and even international media attention.

    Here are the Seven Keys to Responsible Marketing, and how Bumvertising measures up:

    1. It’s not casting responsible, as long as they exploit people desperate for any kind of help.
    2. It’s hard to determine if its environmentally responsible, since Bumvertising’s ads are taped to the bottom of the used cardboard signs used by the homeless.
    3. It’s not socially responsible.
    4. It’s not strategically responsible. This was a tactical idea executed without forethought or consideration of the consequences. Even fringe advertisers run the risk of implying “use our product, you’ll end up like this.” Online poker, casinos and alcohol couldn’t be a worse choice.
    5. It’s not execution responsible. This makes sandwich board marketers look dignified.
    6. It’s not message responsible. Bumvertising clearly doesn’t respect its audiences. And while you might think Bumvertising does break through the clutter, to many, the homeless are like ads already—they’ll avoid them whenever possible.
    7. It’s not ROI responsible. After three years, the only advertisers appear to be other companies started by Bumvertising’s founder, PokerFaceBook.com and StrategicDomination.com—two companies that won’t be appearing on any “fastest growing companies” lists anytime soon. In fact, the first company appears to be abandoned, and both companies shill Bumvertising prominently above the fold.

    Bumvertising is a bad advertising idea. It exploits the homeless, no respectable company would associate itself with the practice and it simply doesn’t work.

    As an advertising medium, Bumvertising is a failure, but as a way to gain media attention it’s a success.

    Rogovy knows this. The Bumvertising blog now features street videos that include altercations with a homeless man and other videos that will be passed around for all the wrong reasons, racking up site visits and increasing Google Adwords revenues.

    Like MTV’s Jackass and so many YouTube exploitation videos, it’s outrageous and brings out the worst in human nature.

    Even The Daily Show considered Bumvertising unscrupulous:


    View this video on YouTube

    Ben Rogovy is on his way to becoming the Johnny Knoxville of marketing. He doesn’t mind being known as the “poverty pimp” as long as he continues to get more media attention.

    Which makes the whole Bumvertising concept that much more insipid.

    Bumvertising: Welcome to the Responsible Marketing Hall of Shame.

    I can’t think of a single category that Bumvertising fits, can you?

    Comment below to weigh in.

    Subscribe to this feed.

    . . .

    Thanks to my colleague Victoria Ostrovskaya for the tip.

    An old way to simplify a complex idea

    Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008

    Getting a prospect’s attention is tough enough, but let’s say you are able to break through. Now that you have their attention, can you keep it?

    Think your prospect will read four pages of copy to learn how you are different? Think again.

    We live in a sound-bite culture where scanning—not reading—is the norm.

    Sure, you can use Flash and other multimedia tools to help you get your point across, but not all users will be able to view it on all platforms.

    That’s why I’m a fan of good-old-fashioned illustration.

    The best example I’ve seen using illustration to describe a complex idea is for Google Chrome, a new browser Google will offer in beta today.

    Google created an online comic book featuring the project’s developers.

    Google Chrome comic book intro - Click to view the entire first page.

    I had no idea this was a comic book when I started reading it, but 38 pages later, I had powered through the entire thing. More importantly, I believe I now have a strong understanding of the major technical differences this browser will offer.

    Notice I said “technical” differences. This was done so well, even a guy with limited technical knowledge like yours truly got it. If this is as good as it looks, Google will have another hit on its hands.

    The next time you have a complex idea you want to communicate, consider illustration.

    If done well, it will help you get—and keep—your audience’s attention.

    Have you seen illustration used to make something complex easier to digest?

    Comment below to share.

    Subscribe to this feed.