Archive for the ‘roi responsible’ Category

Channel strategy: What you need to know now

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

channel strategy

By Herman Kwik, Ph.D.

When I work with entrepreneurs or inventors who are excited about their new products and eager to get busy “marketing,” I often have to urge caution – for two reasons:

Because when they say “marketing” they really mean “selling,” and that’s a different operation altogether. Because entrepreneurs don’t always consider the sequence of events necessary for “marketing” to be properly deployed.

In launching a new product—as opposed to offering a service—there is one strategic element that is rarely given its proper due: deciding on the channel strategy.

Failure to carefully plan a channel strategy is perhaps the No. 1 mistake entrepreneurs make in their rush-to-market approach. Unfortunately, the consequences of such an oversight are significant.

For example, industry statistics indicate that 50 to 80 percent of new products fail within five years. Granted, not all failures are the result of poor channel planning. But the lack of channel planning severely reduces a new product’s already slim chance to succeed in the marketplace.

So how do I develop my channel strategy?

First, let’s define the term. Simply put, channel strategy is a set of decisions that identifies the path a product must take from producer to end user. There are three channels that must be considered: sales channel, product channel and service channel. Although some channel intermediaries may serve one or more of these three different channel roles, it is essential to refine your new product’s marketing strategy through each of these three lenses.

  1. The sales channel. These are intermediaries involved in selling your product through each channel layer and ultimately to the end user. The key question is this: Who needs to sell to whom for your product to be sold to your end user?
  2. The product channel. The product channel focuses on the series of intermediaries who physically handle the product on its path from its producer to the end user.
  3. The service channel. The service channel refers to the entities who provide necessary services to support your product launch, as it moves through the sales channel and after purchase by the end user. The service channel is an important consideration for products that are complex in terms of installation or customer assistance.

The four key points to consider when building your channel strategy:

  1. Internal capabilities. Be honest and identify where you might need help. Do you have the resources to service end users directly? Do you have the ability to service all the retailers who should be carrying your product? And what about your sales staff? Is it large enough to call on distributors who handle regional markets?
  2. Margins and fees. Every intermediary extracts a fee or reduces your profit margin. How will these costs impact your pricing to wholesalers? To direct-to-retail buyers? To end consumers? What about the fees your channel partners charge each other? How will those affect the end user’s price? And finally, how will your channel partners handle discounts, coupons or rebates?
  3. Market connections. Identify which channel partners have the necessary relationships to help place your product. Is your selection of channel partners consistent with your brand identity and positioning? Do the best-connected distributors also carry your competitors’ products? If you use multiple distributors in overlapping markets can you manage conflicts over territories?
  4. Alternative channels. Develop alternate channels to ensure continued sales growth. If key distributors or retailers refuse to carry your product, do you have other creative but still strategic ways of reaching your targeted end users?

So where do I start?

Having said all that, there is one additional factor that complicates even the best of plans: The Power-Trust balance between the producers and channel partners.

Here’s what I mean. Let’s say that you plan to use a certain wholesaler to sell your product into key retail outlets. Naturally, wholesalers and retailers prefer to handle products with a proven level of demand. In fact, they may refuse to carry new products with insufficient demand, although that’s a rare occurrence, since consumers like new things. But ultimately, producers are in a weak bargaining position. They can only trust that their product will be marketed properly, while the channel players maintain the power to dictate the terms of the relationship.

As demand increases, however, power shifts upstream to the producer, and reliance on trust shifts downstream to the retailer. Once a product reaches a high level of demand, the producer gains the power to dictate how the product is marketed by its channel players. The downstream channel players have to trust that the producer will deal with them equitably.

Take Nike’s dispute with Foot Locker stores in 2003 as an example. There is no doubt that there is high demand for Nike products in general, and for Air Jordan brand shoes in particular. But that didn’t keep Foot Locker from mistakenly thinking that it still had the power to dictate the terms of the relationship. They were sorely mistaken when Nike decided to withhold inventory from them, putting a dent in their revenues and strengthening their competitors in the process.

Nike is clearly the power holder in that channel, but it takes years for most producer—especially for new ventures—to reach that point.

How then does a new product build demand in order to acquire this coveted power position? By utilizing effective consumer marketing communications (advertising and direct mail) and promotions (discounts and special events) to generate increased demand to pull products through the channels.

Remember: Demand is the driver that changes the Power-Trust balance.

Herman Kwik, Ph.D. is Marketing Integrator + Principal at Outsource Marketing in Bellevue, Washington. His experience includes work in international trade and supply chain management.

Subscribe to this feed.

The 7 Keys to Responsible Marketing in 2 Minutes

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

Want to know what Responsible Marketing is about but don’t have the time to read our white paper on the topic?

Well, here’s “The 7 Keys to Responsible Marketing in 2 Minutes,” featuring the characters you’ve grown to love (or hate) in our Responsible Marketing web shorts.


View on YouTube

There ya go—with a video that short, now everyone has time to learn about Responsible Marketing. Share away. :)

Subscribe to this feed.

Will the economy kill creativity?

Thursday, November 20th, 2008

Breaking through the clutter amid consumer cynicism and information overload requires creativity.

Creativity comes in all forms. It can be beautiful, disturbing, fascinating, shocking, heartwarming, awe-inspiring, scary, fun—you get the point.

We all know that creativity isn’t always easy to sell. Sometimes it’s the budget. Other times it’s inertia. But whatever it is, experiencing something that evokes real emotion—good or bad, is special.

Here are three ads that are creative, for very different reasons:

This ad for Australian tourism feels like a trailer for a major motion picture. No surprise there: It was Directed by Baz Luhrmann, the man that brought you “Moulin Rouge” and “Romeo and Juliet.”

While the country was still reeling from the 9/11 attacks, advertisers were in an awkward position: How could they keep their brand in front of consumers without seeming insensitive about the situation? Budweiser pulled it off with this ad.

As one of the world’s most recognized consumer brands in one of the most highly competitive categories, the bar is always high for Coca-Cola. This ad was like nothing before it.

I’d hate to see visually interesting advertising like this go away. These are the ads that build long-term value in a company—that help ingrain a brand into a consumer’s mind.

On the flip side, when it comes to what drives sales, advertising isn’t necessarily the most cost effective form of promotion:

Promotional Cost Effectiveness graphic

The fact is, it is strategically responsible to move some marketing dollars from advertising to sales promotion to keep sales moving until the economy rebounds.

Marketing budgets shouldn’t be discretionary, but they usually are. With what remains, will sales promotion get all of the marketing budget, reducing advertising to nothing more than offers and dollars-off coupons?

It could happen.

Given the economy is that what should happen?

David Ogilvy once said “If it doesn’t sell, it isn’t creative” but he wasn’t advocating promotional advertising. To the contrary, his point was that without creativity you won’t break through. And in a way, he was saying your advertising has to be creative to be ROI responsible.

So, what do you think?

Will the economy force marketers to move their budgets to short-term, sales-driven promotions? And if they do, will creativity take a hit?

Comment below to share.

Subscribe to this feed.

Bumvertising: Welcome to the Hall of Shame

Tuesday, September 16th, 2008

Bumvertising is exactly what it sounds like: Advertising on the homeless.

It started in 2005 when 22-year-old University of Washington grad Ben Rogovy was looking for a cheap way to promote another company he started.

Here’s a quick overview:


View this video on YouTube

The Bumvertising debate has attracted local, national and even international media attention.

Here are the Seven Keys to Responsible Marketing, and how Bumvertising measures up:

  1. It’s not casting responsible, as long as they exploit people desperate for any kind of help.
  2. It’s hard to determine if its environmentally responsible, since Bumvertising’s ads are taped to the bottom of the used cardboard signs used by the homeless.
  3. It’s not socially responsible.
  4. It’s not strategically responsible. This was a tactical idea executed without forethought or consideration of the consequences. Even fringe advertisers run the risk of implying “use our product, you’ll end up like this.” Online poker, casinos and alcohol couldn’t be a worse choice.
  5. It’s not execution responsible. This makes sandwich board marketers look dignified.
  6. It’s not message responsible. Bumvertising clearly doesn’t respect its audiences. And while you might think Bumvertising does break through the clutter, to many, the homeless are like ads already—they’ll avoid them whenever possible.
  7. It’s not ROI responsible. After three years, the only advertisers appear to be other companies started by Bumvertising’s founder, PokerFaceBook.com and StrategicDomination.com—two companies that won’t be appearing on any “fastest growing companies” lists anytime soon. In fact, the first company appears to be abandoned, and both companies shill Bumvertising prominently above the fold.

Bumvertising is a bad advertising idea. It exploits the homeless, no respectable company would associate itself with the practice and it simply doesn’t work.

As an advertising medium, Bumvertising is a failure, but as a way to gain media attention it’s a success.

Rogovy knows this. The Bumvertising blog now features street videos that include altercations with a homeless man and other videos that will be passed around for all the wrong reasons, racking up site visits and increasing Google Adwords revenues.

Like MTV’s Jackass and so many YouTube exploitation videos, it’s outrageous and brings out the worst in human nature.

Even The Daily Show considered Bumvertising unscrupulous:


View this video on YouTube

Ben Rogovy is on his way to becoming the Johnny Knoxville of marketing. He doesn’t mind being known as the “poverty pimp” as long as he continues to get more media attention.

Which makes the whole Bumvertising concept that much more insipid.

Bumvertising: Welcome to the Responsible Marketing Hall of Shame.

I can’t think of a single category that Bumvertising fits, can you?

Comment below to weigh in.

Subscribe to this feed.

. . .

Thanks to my colleague Victoria Ostrovskaya for the tip.

Responsible Reading: Marketing Management

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

Seems every marketing book claims to offer the silver bullet—the marketing secret that guarantees incredible success. I’ve read 100’s of marketing books—including some great ones—but there are no shortcuts, folks.

To be a Responsible Marketer, you need a strong grounding in the fundamentals.

You won’t learn them in a three-day seminar, and probably don’t have the time to return to college, so what do you do?

Read Marketing Management by Philip Kotler and Kevin Lane Keller.

Marketing Management by Kotler and Keller

Amazon’s description is spot on:

Kotler/Keller is the gold standard in the marketing management discipline because it continues to reflect the latest changes in marketing theory and practice.

Topics covered include brand equity, customer value analysis, database marketing, e-commerce, value networks, hybrid channels, supply chain management, segmentation, targeting, positioning, and integrated marketing communications.

For marketing professionals who place special emphasis to creativity and imagination in marketing management.

At 816 pages, this book is huge, but don’t let the size fool you. It’s filled with diagrams and case studies that make it an easier read than many textbooks. This book will back-fill the things you don’t know and give you a great foundation to build on.

Though it’s expensive ($120 at Amazon with a $53 discount!) I’d suggest owning a copy to use as go-to marketing reference (I do).

If you are serious about Responsible Marketing, you should read it, at least once, cover to cover.

So, if you could recommend just one good foundational marketing book, what would it be?

Please comment below to share.

Subscribe to this feed.

How Responsible Marketing builds trust

Thursday, August 7th, 2008

Some people think trust is gained through integrity only. Not so, says Steven M.R. Covey in The Speed of Trust. Trust is equal parts character and competence.

Here’s how character and competence are directly related to Responsible Marketing:

trust = character + competency

It takes more than just doing marketing right. For long-term success, you really have to do the right thing, too. And while if You can do the right thing, but if you execute your marketing poorly, it won’t matter.

But if you can execute your marketing well and communicate character, you really have something.

What are you doing to build trust with your customers and prospects?

Comment below to share.

Does marketing need a heart?

Tuesday, July 29th, 2008

Proposed Creative Workflow, by Frank Chimero

There are seven keys to Responsible Marketing.

Most would agree the first four keys are necessary just to do marketing right:

  • Strategically responsible – to save time, money and improve focus
  • Execution responsible – with best practices instead of best efforts
  • Casting responsible – so your have the right people in the right roles, internally and externally
  • ROI responsible – because your efforts must impact the bottom line
  • The three keys necessary if marketers want to gain the respect and trust of customers and do the right thing are:

  • Message responsible – to respect all your audiences
  • Environmentally responsible – since our world needs us to be
  • Socially responsible – because marketing is more than moving product
  • Some have told me they believe Responsible Marketing is marketing infused with equal parts logic and heart.

    And without heart, does creativity, strategy and everything else loses its relevance?

    Do you believe marketing needs a heart to be effective?

    Comment below to weigh in.

    . . .

    Image: Frank Chimero Illustration & Design, via AdPulp.

    I’ve got some Cheetos. Let’s go vandalize something!

    Thursday, May 29th, 2008

    Are you ready to join the Orange Underground? You know, a place where you can cause a little mischief (RAoC – Random Acts of Cheetos) then upload your videos to YouTube and become rich (in Cheetos) and famous (on Comedy Central)?

    Here are a few of the professionally produced ads from the Orange Underground campaign:

    Okay, so they are humorous, sort of. And taken in and of themselves, pretty harmless.

    But Cheetos and ad agency Goodby, Silverstein & Partners of San Francisco weren’t interested in pretty harmless.

    Nope.

    It’s all about going viral these days, folks.

    It’s about building community.

    Heck, create a movement if you can.

    At the end of each ad, you are invited to “Join Now” by visiting OrangeUnderground.com. When you do, you are greeted by the twenty-something below who tells you what it’s all about.

    This “underground” is trying so hard and feels so phony, it’s like a bad SNL skit that won’t end. And I don’t mean so bad it’s good.

    So, what’s the deal with Random Acts of Cheetos, anyway?

    Bob Garfield describes it in his Ad Age article, Cheetos Ads That Promote ‘Random Acts’ Are Irresponsible:

    . . .there is another word for Random Acts of Cheetos: vandalism. The Cheetos Underground explicitly incites its shadowy network of crap eaters not only to perpetrate mischief but to document their petty crimes on video for the Cheetos website.

    Encouraging vandalism can hardly be considered socially responsible. But luckily for homeowners, teachers, bosses and innocent bystanders, this campaign wasn’t strategic or execution responsible and few have been molested with the orange snack.

    The underground campaign failed to recognize that this demographic seeks authenticity (an underground better look like an underground, not a Cheetos-branded one).

    And why would you have an animated spokes-tiger for a campaign like this? Remove him from the ads and they become instantly darker and more disturbing.

    I don’t get it, but is it working? I don’t know, but consider these facts:

    The blog is a ghost town (11 total posts, 26 total comments). There are only 135 user-generated videos on YouTube. And the total YouTube downloads over the last three months for all three videos above is a paltry 277,800 (70% are for the laundry commercial alone).

    Compare those view counts to some of the other viral videos discussed here over the last few months:

  • Viva Chihuahuas from Disney (485,000 in four weeks)
  • Charity Water (656,682 in eight weeks)
  • D2 Man from TopFlite (1,040,707 in eight weeks)
  • Verisign’s Cart Whisperer (1,199,346 in nine weeks)
  • Awareness Test for Transport of London (3,560,865 in eight weeks)
  • So, what’s the bigger crime?

    Trying to incite vandalism or the execution of the campaign itself?

    Comment below to weigh in.

    Beware of “no brainer” marketing tactics

    Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

    We all know it now: Digital marketing kicks butt.

    Organizations big and small should be investing in paid search, SEO and email marketing. In some categories the ROI makes putting most (if not all) of your marketing budget into digital marketing a no-brainer.

    Or is it?

    Care to guess how many people have never sent an email in the U.S.?

    Nope. That’s way too low.

    According to a recent study by Park Associates, 20% of the U.S. population has never sent an email.

    “No brainer” ideas often end up making people wonder if we indeed have no brains.

    Consider your target: Where they go for their information. How they make their buying decisions. What turns them on.

    Consider the promotional cost effectiveness of each marketing discipline relative to the stages of buyer readiness. To be responsible, your marketing must be media and discipline neutral.

    And whatever you do, don’t put all your marketing eggs in a digital basket.

    Have you ever been told about a “no brainer” marketing idea? How did it turn out?

    Comment below to share your thoughts.

    Subscribe to this feed.

    . . .

    The graphic is our prettied up version of a graph in Philip Kotler’s Marketing Management.

    The Seven Keys to Responsible Marketing

    Wednesday, April 30th, 2008

    Each month, we share marketing articles, links and information with the Friends of Outsource Marketing. This month, we added “podcast” to that list.

    My partner Bill Boyd has done quite a few podcasts for clients, and decided it was time to do one for us.

    Click play below to listen:

    [audio:http://homepage.mac.com/bill_boyd/Patrick%20Byers%20-%20Responsible%20Marketing%20-%20042508%202.mp3]

    Can you help me answer a few questions?

    1. Do you like an audio format?
    2. If no, how can we change it to make it better?
    3. If yes, what is your desired frequency for podcasts?

    Thanks for your help.