Posts Tagged ‘advertising’

Should excessively noisy ads be banned?

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

Excessively noisy ads to be banned?

One of the Seven Keys to Responsible Marketing is being message responsible. That means marketers should respect all their audiences by seeking permission, telling the truth, honoring privacy and avoiding clutter.

Yelling at consumers isn’t very respectful, and the U.S. House of Representatives has recently approved a bill which aims to limit the volume of television advertisements.

Eric Weaver at Tribal DDB in Vancouver calls it “A win for consumers, a loss for self-interested advertisers” and I couldn’t agree more.

But what do you think? Should the government regulate annoying advertising?

Comment below to weigh in.

Subscribe to this feed.

Sex Sells: Just Ask Him.

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

In advertising, it’s the gospel truth: Sex sells.

You’ve heard it a million times. So many times it’s gotta be true, right?

Hell, even the Devil himself says it’s true in our second of seven Responsible Marketing web shorts, here:


View on YouTube in HD

Why not believe it? You just heard it from the Devil himself.

Well, because it’s all a lie.

Sex sells sex.
Sex gets attention.
And sex creates controversy.

But it seldom converts attention to action.
And most people don’t recall the brand the ad was for.

Men respond better than women to sexy ads, as expected. But in Buyology, author Martin Lindstrom shared this interesting tidbit: One study found that even for men, recall for sexually explicit ads was less than 10%, but recall was nearly twice that for the non-sexually charged ads.

Steve Hall of Adrants puts it perfectly when talking about sex in advertising call it:

. . . a lame cop-out used by marketers who lack imagination to create more compelling work that will sustain itself beyond the initial titillation.

I couldn’t agree more, but what do you think?

Subscribe to this feed.

Facebook’s ad feedback function fail

Monday, September 21st, 2009

You know the ads on the right hand column of your Facebook feeds page?

Here’s a view I’ve received a lot lately:

mafia wars ads

Yeah. I know. You’ve seen these ads enough already.

Not sure why I’d receive ‘em…I’m not a gamer and there’s nothing in my profile that would lead you to believe I’d be interested in this.  In fact, I really don’t like seeing a gun or a crime scene every time I log on to Facebook.

So I’ve nuked these ads whenever I’ve seen them, using Facebook’s advertising feedback feature:

facebook ad feedback

Now that’s what advertisers and users are looking for: Users can receive tailored ads, and advertisers can build a feedback loop for their creative.

Well, at least in concept.

You see, I decided to delete all the “Mafia Wars” ads that popped up, and they simply kept appearing—sometimes two to three of them at once. It didn’t seem to matter which reason I gave, they still littered my screen.

Look, I like a good mob movie as much as the next guy—but what if I really found these offensive? I’d be pissed.

This practice isn’t just anti-user, it’s anti-advertiser.

Somebody has said every way they can that they don’t want to see your ad—but Facebook is still serving them up?

Sure, the feedback widget says “Over time, this information helps us deliver more relevant ads to our users” but if you are given the option to remove an ad because it’s offensive, misleading or anything else on the list, shouldn’t your wishes be granted there and then? Are there any advertisers out there that really want to offend people over and over?

I started deleting the “Mafia Wars” ads weeks ago. And while they don’t pop up nearly as much, I’m still receiving them.

It’s nice Facebook is asking for feedback, especially since it appears they are using the information provided to improve the user experience…somewhat.

But they aren’t asking people to passively answer a poll regarding the color of their wallpaper. They are asking people if they find an ad offensive or misleading. If the user says “yes, this offends me,” the ad needs to disappear from their user experience—forever.

What do you think?

Subscribe to this feed.

Is Burger King’s “Square Butts” ad responsible?

Friday, April 10th, 2009

Last night, a friend from high school sent me this question via Facebook:

Can you explain why ANYONE (let alone Burger King) would think it a good idea to adapt “I like Big Butts” to market a children’s meal?

Here’s the ad in question:


Extended version

This is one of the classic Responsible Marketing questions we talk about here. It takes real creativity to break through, and this ad is creative. But it’s also controversial, and controversy gets people talking and drives word of mouth. I’d argue this ad is almost impossible to keep to yourself.

Burger King knew exactly what they were approving: A funny, but potentially offensive ad for parents that they’d never want their young children to see.

Mission accomplished.

I am Burger King’s target:

  • I have small children
  • Sir-Mix-A-Lot song was popular when I was in college
  • And I laughed out loud when Mix-A-Lot himself said “Booty is booty”  at the end

But the idea of my kids seeing this ad makes me cringe. The word “butt” is off limits in my house (my kids are age six and four), and the sexual references are everywhere.

Hamilton Nolan at Gawker.com puts it this way:

The point is Sir Mix-a-Lot is teaching obesity and sexuality to your kids and you’re really okay with that, deep down, because you love Whoppers.

Is this ad message responsible?

I don’t think so.

But what’s your take?

Subscribe to this feed.

How tolerant is your marketing?

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

Do you respect all your audiences?

Really? Are you sure?

Watch the following ad, then answer the question again:


Watch this video on YouTube

So, now do you believe you respecting all of your audiences?

This spot from Banco Provincia of Argentina was a real eye-opener for me.

Respectful ads targeted to the gay and lesbian market are rare enough. But a company—a bank, nonetheless—treating a transgendered person in such a thoughtful, dignified way? Incredible.

Check out the comments on YouTube: They’re overwhelmingly positive.

When Lissa Boles shared this with me, she asked if this was “the epitome of Responsible Marketing?”

I say it is.

What say you?

Subscribe to this feed.

Rude, crude and funny ads: Love ‘em or hate ‘em?

Friday, February 13th, 2009

We all love to laugh, and when we find something genuinely funny, we love to share it.

But humor is subjective and what’s funny to some is offensive to others.

Case in point: One of the following ads was banned, the other wasn’t.


View this video on YouTube


View this video on YouTube

I’ll admit, crude, sophomoric ads like these are a guilty pleasure for me. They make me laugh out loud, but I’d be embarrassed if my young children saw them. For that matter, I’d be embarrassed if my mom saw them, and I’m over 40.

So do you love or hate ads like these?

And how far is too far?

Comment below to weigh in.

Subscribe to this feed.

The Most and Least Responsible Super Bowl ads

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

Monster: Need a new job? ad

Once again, the Super Bowl was indeed super, but how about the ads?

A few ads brought sustained belly laughs, others brought groans.

But which were responsible, and which weren’t?

For review, visit my Super Bowl XVIII ads page.

Cast up to five votes in following polls.

[poll=11]

[poll=12]

If you’d like to weigh in on any of the ads, please comment below.

Subscribe to this feed.

Super Bowl XLIII ads

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

Here are all the ads from Super Bowl XLIII, all assembled on one page for your review.

Review the ones you missed, then cast your vote for Most and Least Responsible Ads of Super Bowl XLIII.

Enjoy.

THE ADS

Subscribe to this feed.

Is Belkin’s apology for astroturfing enough?

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Is Belkin's apology for astroturfing enough?

First, what’s “astroturfing?”

Roughly, it’s when formal political, advertising, or public relations campaigns seek to create the impression of spontaneous “grassroots” behavior, hence the reference to the artificial grass, AstroTurf.*

On Friday, The Daily Background Blog revealed that a Belkin employee was doing just that: Paying 65 cents for perfect reviews on Buy.com, NewEgg.com and Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk, where people can receive micropayments for small technical tasks computers can’t do.

To their credit, Belkin’s CEO responded over the weekend, stating that “Belkin does not participate in, nor does it endorse, unethical practices like this.” The company went on to take responsibility, asked forgiveness and claimed Belkin will remove all the false reviews and posts on Mechanical Turk.

Hats off to Belkin for the quick response—this is exactly the way this should have been handled and they’ve surely avoided even more negative word of mouth.

But I ask you, Responsible Marketer, at what point do we hold a company accountable for the actions of its representatives? Is all forgiven with Belkin? Could this have been avoided?

Seems like a great argument for social media training to me, but what do you think?

Subscribe to this feed.

. . .


Thanks to Freddy Nager at Atomic Tango for sharing the Belkin story with me.
*My revision of the Wikipedia definition

10 of my favorite lists from 2008

Thursday, January 1st, 2009

10 of my favorite lists from 2008

Happy New Year!

I know. I’ve ranted about lists before, but to start off 2009, one of my resolutions is to lighten up (a little) about lists.

Here’s a list of 10 of my favorite lists from last year, in no particular order:

  • The 10 most admired companies of 2008
    Fortune Magazine
  • 50 ideas on using Twitter for business
    Chris Brogan
  • Top 10 Viral Videos
    Time Magazine
  • Freakiest ads of 2008
    AdFreak
  • The 10 worst political ads of the season
    Politico.com, via Dan Tynan
  • 10 creepiest old ads
    Weird News
  • 12 Ways Porn has changed the web (for good and evil)
    Dan Tynan
  • 14 big businesses that started in a recession
    Inside CRM
  • Five Sexist Trends Advertising World Can’t Shake
    Huffington Post (Warning: Explicit language)
  • Dozens of free social media monitoring tools (1, 2, 3)
    Mashable.com, MarketingPilgrim.com
  • Have a few of your own faves? Share ‘em below.

    Subscribe to this feed.