Posts Tagged ‘Center for Science in the Public Interest’

VitaminWater or the CSPI: Who do you believe?

Friday, February 6th, 2009

vitaminwater-from-coca-cola-cspi

The Coca-Cola Company is being sued by the Center for Science in the Public Interest for deceptive claims regarding it’s VitaminWater product line.

Coke markets VitaminWater as a “healthful alternative to soda by labeling its several flavors with such health buzz words,” and claims they “variously reduce the risk of chronic disease, reduce the risk of eye disease, promote healthy joints, and support optimal immune function.”

The CSPI news release further asserts, “VitaminWater contains between zero and one percent juice, despite the full names of the drinks, which include “endurance peach mango” and “focus kiwi strawberry,” and “xxx blueberry pomegranate acai,” among others. A press release for the “xxx” drink claims its antioxidants makes the drinker “last longer” in some unspecified way; in any event, it has no blueberry, pomegranate, or acai juice, nor do the others have any cranberry, grapefruit, dragon fruit, peach, mango, kiwi, or strawberry juice.”

Here’s Coke’s response to the CSPI lawsuit:

This is a ridiculous and ludicrous lawsuit. glacéau vitaminwater is a great tasting, hydrating beverage with essential vitamins and water, with labels showing calorie content.

Filing a lawsuit is an opportunistic PR stunt. This is not about protecting the public interest. This is about grandstanding at a time when CSPI is receiving very little attention. There is no surprise that one week before the inauguration of the U.S. President, with the flurry of activity in Washington, D.C., that CSPI has chosen today to try to bring attention to themselves.

We don’t need a “healthful” alternative to sodas. All our beverages, including sparkling and diets, can be part of healthful diet. Furthermore, consumers today are aware and are looking for more from their beverages than just hydration. Products like glacéau vitaminwater provide a great tasting choice for hydration that also helps contribute to daily needs for some essential nutrients.

Consumers can readily see the nutrition facts panels on every bottle of glacéau vitaminwater, which show what’s in our product and what’s not. The success of glacéau vitaminwater is due in large part to consumers looking for a product like this to help support their healthy, active and on-the-go lifestyle.

Put simply, glacéau vitaminwater is a great complement to our often less-than-perfect diet with each of the different glacéau vitaminwater varieties providing a convenient, great-tasting way to get more of some of the vitamins and hydration we all need each day.

Public opinion on the topic is polarized, as you might expect.

So who do you believe? VitaminWater or the CSPI?

Is VitaminWater responsible or not?

Subscribe to this feed.

. . .

Image: The Coca-Cola Company

I got duped by Airborne

Thursday, April 3rd, 2008

At least she didn’t waste money on Airborne.

Seems everyone I know has been down for the count this year with a cold, the flu or some other crud that just won’t go away.

It also seems everyone I know swears by Airborne.

We have a tube in our cabinet and have purchased the stuff since shortly after the product appeared.

Boy, do I feel stupid.

Last month, the company agreed to a $23.3 million settlement in a class action lawsuit against them for false advertising by the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

Why? Airborne is not a cold remedy and it’s never been proven to work. The double-blind tests the company has used in its marketing claims were a farce conducted by two a two-person research group, and one of the researchers had a fake diploma.

CSPI senior nutritionist David Schardt evaluated Airborne’s marketing claims and concluded:

There’s no credible evidence that what’s in Airborne can prevent colds or protect you from a germy environment.

Airborne is basically an overpriced, run-of-the-mill vitamin pill that’s been cleverly, but deceptively, marketed.

The “message for our loyal users” from the Airborne’s CEO on the company website revises history, stating that “Airborne helps support your immune system—just like it always has.” In fact, the company is facing more potential charges from the FTC and 24 State Attorneys General for the company’s claims that Airborne is the “miracle cold buster.”

There’s no link off that page to any information for refunds, but a “rebate” is available. Unfortunately, the company has buried the information on their website in the FAQ’s in the “Promotions/Rebates” section. You need proof of purchase and a receipt to get any money back, but I couldn’t find any explanation of what the company considers proof of purchase.

Nice.

False advertising makes me sick. Especially when I fall for it.

What do you think?