Posts Tagged ‘Coke’

The Pepsi vs. Coke social good smackdown

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Coke vs. Pepsi

When Coke and Pepsi start being judged by their social responsibility as much as their taste (and their ads), you’ll know Responsible Marketing has arrived, right? Well, that time has come.

The Huffington Post recently ran an online poll pitting Pepsi’s Refresh Project Vs. Coke’s Live Positively campaigns.

The associated article does a great job laying out the differences between the campaigns, then left it up to readers to choose which campaign they preferred.

For marketers wanting to reach the younger generation, this makes sense:

This “conscious capitalism” has been a growing trend, and for good reason. A 2006 Millennial Cause Study by Cone Inc. and AMP Insights found that 69% of Millennials will consider a company’s social and environmental commitment when deciding where to shop, and a whopping 89% are likely to switch from one brand to another if the second brand is associated with a good cause. That’s powerful motivation for companies fighting for market share.


So, which campaign do you find most compelling?

Subscribe to this feed.

. . .

Image: Huffington Post

VitaminWater or the CSPI: Who do you believe?

Friday, February 6th, 2009

vitaminwater-from-coca-cola-cspi

The Coca-Cola Company is being sued by the Center for Science in the Public Interest for deceptive claims regarding it’s VitaminWater product line.

Coke markets VitaminWater as a “healthful alternative to soda by labeling its several flavors with such health buzz words,” and claims they “variously reduce the risk of chronic disease, reduce the risk of eye disease, promote healthy joints, and support optimal immune function.”

The CSPI news release further asserts, “VitaminWater contains between zero and one percent juice, despite the full names of the drinks, which include “endurance peach mango” and “focus kiwi strawberry,” and “xxx blueberry pomegranate acai,” among others. A press release for the “xxx” drink claims its antioxidants makes the drinker “last longer” in some unspecified way; in any event, it has no blueberry, pomegranate, or acai juice, nor do the others have any cranberry, grapefruit, dragon fruit, peach, mango, kiwi, or strawberry juice.”

Here’s Coke’s response to the CSPI lawsuit:

This is a ridiculous and ludicrous lawsuit. glacéau vitaminwater is a great tasting, hydrating beverage with essential vitamins and water, with labels showing calorie content.

Filing a lawsuit is an opportunistic PR stunt. This is not about protecting the public interest. This is about grandstanding at a time when CSPI is receiving very little attention. There is no surprise that one week before the inauguration of the U.S. President, with the flurry of activity in Washington, D.C., that CSPI has chosen today to try to bring attention to themselves.

We don’t need a “healthful” alternative to sodas. All our beverages, including sparkling and diets, can be part of healthful diet. Furthermore, consumers today are aware and are looking for more from their beverages than just hydration. Products like glacéau vitaminwater provide a great tasting choice for hydration that also helps contribute to daily needs for some essential nutrients.

Consumers can readily see the nutrition facts panels on every bottle of glacéau vitaminwater, which show what’s in our product and what’s not. The success of glacéau vitaminwater is due in large part to consumers looking for a product like this to help support their healthy, active and on-the-go lifestyle.

Put simply, glacéau vitaminwater is a great complement to our often less-than-perfect diet with each of the different glacéau vitaminwater varieties providing a convenient, great-tasting way to get more of some of the vitamins and hydration we all need each day.

Public opinion on the topic is polarized, as you might expect.

So who do you believe? VitaminWater or the CSPI?

Is VitaminWater responsible or not?

Subscribe to this feed.

. . .

Image: The Coca-Cola Company

Coke v. Pepsi: Refreshingly irresponsible

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

Coke and Pepsi are at it again.

They battled it out on New Year’s Eve in Times Square with Pepsi revealing it’s new Refresh Everything campaign while Coke introduced it’s Refresh. Recycle. Repeat. green campaign, wind-powered billboards and all.

Here’s Pepsi’s New Year Eve video:

Both campaigns are refreshing, but that’s the problem.

By using the word “Refresh,” either Pepsi or Coke is breaking rule #6 of the 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing: Two companies cannot own the same word in the prospect’s mind.

I don’t know who claimed the word “refresh” first, but the company that claimed it second is guilty of irresponsible marketing.

If you know who claimed “refresh” first, or if you just want to show your Coke or Pepsi allegiance, comment below.

Subscribe to this feed.

Archie Bunker as pitchman? Almost.

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

Would you like someone that makes “tasteless jokes about sex, AIDS, religion and bodily functions, purposely offending just about every group of people you could name” to represent your product?

How about a character that have “been criticized for everything from anti-Semitism and sexism to homophobia and overall disgustingness?”

Sounds like Archie Bunker, the bombastic bigot and lead character of the hit 70’s television show All in the Family to me.

Of course, no respectable company would have hired Carroll O’Connor to pitch their product in character. Who’d want to align themselves with someone like that?

Well, the language above, although fitting, wasn’t used to describe Bunker. It’s from an article in the NY Times today entitled Crude? So What? These Characters Still Find Work in Ads and it’s about the characters of the Fox television series “Family Guy.”

The “Family Guy” characters haven’t been licensed by second tier advertisers or to pitch fringe products. No. The “Family Guy” characters are now being used by White Castle, Subway and Coke.

Although the video above is tame (and the good guy wins), the fact is, Stewie is a diabolical infant bent on world domination—with a foul mouth.

Stewie (to one of the prostitutes at Cleveland’s house):

So, is there any tread left on the tires? Or at this point would it be like throwing a hot dog down a hallway?

Okay, funny, but that would have made Archie Bunker blush.

Ira Mayer, president and publisher at The Licensing Letter, says it “goes with the times,” and “edginess is acceptable,” since girls are wearing suggestive shirts “that 10 years ago girls never would have worn.”

Those were the days.

It’s a Responsible Marketing conundrum: You have to push it to break through, but how far is too far?

What do you think?

Comment below to weigh in.

. . .

Here’s a video of Archie waxing philosophic. Take a gander. You’ll be shocked how relevant his rant is to some of the challenges we are facing as a country—in the world—today.