Posts Tagged ‘smoking’

Is smoking bad for your business?

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

is-smoking-bad-for-your-business

We all know smoking is bad for your health, but is it bad for your business, too?

Here are three examples where, at the very least, the customer experience was damaged by a company’s lackadaisical smoking policies:

  1. Yesterday, two of my co-workers saw a cool bakery truck that caught their attention. The driver had on a nice uniform, and clearly his employer had invested in their brand.Then they saw the driver puffing away on a cigarette in his truck.

    The thought of the smoke getting to the baked goods and then him handling the product, well, grossed them out.

  2. At a restaurant I frequent for lunch, one of the cooks takes a smoke break in front of the establishment then comes back in, washes his hands, and gets back to work.The smoke wafts in often, and when he walks by he smells like a stale pack of smokes. Let’s just say it’s not very appetizing.
  3. My family stayed at a decent hotel right across the street from the main gate at Disneyland last year. The hotel had gone to great lengths to make the entry an experience—with one exception: The pickup and drop-off area featured a bench and a couple of ashtrays.The first time we walked into the hotel, we were treated to a dose of second-hand smoke that took about five years off my life. I thought this was a one-time occurrence, but nearly every time we walked into the hotel, we had to walk through a cloud of cigarette smoke.

I know, this isn’t the Responsible Smoking blog. It’s about marketing.

But considering smoking is on the decline in the U.S., and 80.2% of the people in this country are non-smokers, can you ignore the potential damage your smoking policies may have on your brand?

Can you afford the negative word of mouth?

Am I overreacting, or is this a legitimate concern?

What do you think?

Subscribe to this feed.

. . .

Image: Current

Tobacco in an irresponsible marketing death spiral

Wednesday, December 17th, 2008

Tobacco companies in an irresponsible marketing death spiral

This week, tobacco companies were dealt a blow when the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of allowing lawsuits to proceed under state law for deceptive advertising of “light” cigarettes.

Tobacco companies are now in what I call an irresponsible marketing death spiral:

The proliferation of traditional and social media have created millions of professional and private corporate watchdogs. Irresponsible marketers may be able to run, but they can’t hide.

When irresponsible marketers are caught, the U.S. legal system rewards companies, individuals and attorneys that prosecute said marketers for their actions.

Of course, controversy sells, so traditional and social media will document every step and misstep as the company attempts to respond.

Competitors gain traction as the distracted irresponsible marketing is forced to shift time, money and other resources to defending itself and/or working to mend it’s broken brand.

The company dies a slow, painful death.

Okay, not every marketing misstep will result in a class action lawsuit, boycott, movement or campaign against a company.

It’s usually more subtle than that, as customers and prospects respond with their pocketbooks—and their voices.

Truth, authenticity and transparency are no longer optional, folks.

Responsible Marketing is what the people want. One way or another they are going to get it.

Which other companies (or industries) are entering an irresponsible marketing death spiral now?

Comment below to share.

Subscribe to this feed.

Apple responds to censorship challenge

Monday, August 4th, 2008

Mad Men on iTunes

Last week, Gawker reported that Apple had censored the cigarette from the Mad Men page on iTunes (see above).

For a split second, I thought it was a good thing. I don’t smoke and couldn’t have been happier when Washington State’s Clean Indoor Air Act took effect.

But then I realized just how wrong taking Don Draper’s smokes is. Smoking is so prevalent on the show—and such an integral part of Draper’s character—one could argue it plays a supporting role.

Apple doesn’t appear to be doing this anywhere else: The marijuana leaf in the Weeds logo is intact and the gun in the Sopranos logo doesn’t appear to have the safety on.

Before publishing my post, I thought I should see if Apple had responded, and sure enough, they did.

The Mad Men iTunes page now has the original series branding with the cigarette fully intact.

Is this social responsibility gone overboard?

And did Apple do the right thing in restoring the original image?

Comment below to weigh in.

. . .

The image above is from the Gawker.com post mentioned above.

Smokes that Al Gore would love?

Wednesday, March 5th, 2008

Natural American Spirit Organic Cigarettes

Are you a green smoker? Not green from emphysema, but green as in environmentally responsible.

A little about Natural American Spirit Organic Cigarettes:

We grow our premium natural tobacco in a responsible, sustainable way through our earth-friendly and organic growing programs.

We also strive to reduce our footprint on the earth by using recycled materials and renewable energy sources like wind power.

Protecting the earth is as important to us as it is to you.

Natural American Spirit was founded in 1982 and was purchased by Reynolds American in 2002. Reynolds appears to have let the company maintain its position as an environmentally friendly tobacco company.

Go to their homepage, and you’ll be required to enter your birth date and answer whether you smoke or not. Of course, if you are too young, you are turned away. More impressive is the fact that if you say you aren’t a smoker, they tell you not to start and deny entry.

They use 100% sustainable power, are supporting philanthropic programs for Native Americans, and seem like generally good people.

I guess if I was a smoker, I’d consider them.

My inspiration for the post was from ATIS547’s Flickr photostream. His comment sums up the irony of organic cigarettes:

American Spirit wins the STUPID AWARD, by offering the ecologically responsible way to kill yourself and your loved ones.

I especially love: “Protecting the earth is as important to us as it is to you.” — In other words, the earth is fine — it’s YOU we’d like to see dead.

Has Natural American Spirit simply found a niche and is serving it in the most responsible way possible?

Or are the folks at Natural American being hypocritical by selling an addictive carcinogenic product that’s sugar-coated green?

What do you think? Responsible or not?