Posts Tagged ‘Snickers’

Love it or hate it: Jawbone viral video campaign

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008

Surely you are familiar with Jawbone, the makers of the excellent noise-canceling Bluetooth headsets for mobile phones. The product really is amazing. I love mine.

But I don’t love their attempt at creating buzz.

I’d rate the first video PG-13.


View the video on YouTube

Two women are sitting in a pub having a casual conversation when a rugby team storms the pub, making a huge ruckus. The production quality is good, and you feel for them. Their conversation is clearly over in all this noise, then the phone rings and one woman picks up her Jawbone.

Of course, the noise is gone and she’s able to begin a conversation.

Message sent. Jawbone plain works.

But that wasn’t enough.

Two of the rugby players begin to kiss. Well, not just kiss, but make out. They take off their shirts and really go for it.

Like the the Snickers kiss ad, this video exploited sexual orientation for shock factor or laughs.

There are so many other things they could have done. A brawl could have broken out–chairs and bodies could have flown over the woman’s head. They could have broken into song. A leprechaun could have walked in and done a jig on the table. Whatever.

Instead of creativity, they chose exploitation.

I’d rate the next video R:


View the video on YouTube

An agitated man walks into an Asian dry cleaner and proceeds to rant about the amount of starch in his shirts. Racial slurs, stereotypes and f-bombs fly.

Then a man ‘in the peanut gallery’ gets a phone call, and since he’s using his Jawbone, the noise is gone. He closes his eyes and enjoys the peace of hearing his call and nothing more.

Once again, message sent. Jawbone works.

But that wasn’t enough, either.

The jackass gets his comeuppance when the family puts a bag over his head and then brutally beats him to death. Oh, wait, he dies of suffocation. There’s no sound, except for the man on his call.

I don’t have virgin ears and I’ve dropped an f-bomb or two in my life. But this video is incredibly insensitive, offensive and violent.

Instead of creativity, they chose cheap racial slurs and Quentin Tarantino-calibre violence.

There are other ads, but it’s really more of the same:

In Hot Girl Gets Wet, a girl relaxing by the pool is interrupted by three loudmouth guys trying to impress her. They jump in, and lo and behold, Jaws Redux.

Wait Staff Eliminates Noise features a rowdy Russian mobster being drowned in his soup by restaurant employees.

THE IRONY

The Jawbone brand is creating buzz all on its own. They have major distribution and are considered by many to be the best Bluetooth headset you can buy.

They didn’t need to resort to exploitational or offensive virals. With minor tweaks, they could have had videos that were immensely entertaining without casting Jawbone as a callous, bigoted and desperate startup.

Put it another way. Can you imagine Apple doing virals like this? Or Red Bull? Or Pepsi? No way.

I noticed jawbonefilms.com is now routed to the company homepage. Maybe they’ve come to the same conclusion.

These videos have been rated well on YouTube so apparently some people like what they are seeing.

So do you love this campaign or hate it?

Comment below to weigh in.

Responsible or not? “Get Some Nuts” with Snickers

Monday, July 21st, 2008

As the best selling candy bar of all time with annual sales of over $2 billion, Snickers has nothing to prove.

The Mars family introduced the brand in 1929 or 1930, depending upon which source you believe. Either way, Snickers is pushing 80—but you’d never know it by its advertising.

To reach their target audience of young men, Snickers has pushed the boundaries of taste over the last few years. The following ad created quite a hubbub:


View the video on YouTube

Wikipedia describes the controversy well:

On February 4, 2007, during Super Bowl XLI, Snickers commercials aired which resulted in complaints by gay and lesbian groups against the maker of the candy bar, Masterfoods USA of Hackettstown, New Jersey, a division of Mars, Incorporated. The commercial, which had four alternate endings, showed a pair of auto mechanics accidentally touching lips while sharing a Snickers bar. Realizing that they “accidentally kissed”, they, in three of the four versions, “do something manly” (mostly in the form of injury, including tearing out chest hair, striking each other with a very large pipe wrench, and drinking motor oil and windshield washer fluid). In the fourth version, a third mechanic shows up and asks if there is “room for three in this Love Boat”.

The website for the commercials, since taken down, also featured Super Bowl players viewing the commercials and reacting with disgust to the “kiss”. The website said that the commercials would be aired during the upcoming Daytona 500. Complaints were lodged against Masterfoods that the ads were homophobic.

I doubt the ad would have fared well here on The Responsible Marketing Blog, but to Masterfoods’ credit, they didn’t crawl into their chocolate-covered shell.

Who can forget the Snickers Dark Bar Viking:


View the video on YouTube

Sure, he’s trashing someone’s car (not particularly responsible), but it’s impossible to take your eyes off of it, nonetheless.

Now, Snickers has introduced “Get Some Nuts.” Check out the following ads:


View the video on YouTube


View the video on YouTube

The site includes Mr. T ringtones, videos, wallpaper and the code to embed the following widget on most social sites and blogs:

As the leader, Snickers could lay low and play it safe. They deserve credit for not doing that.

Sure, “Get Some Nuts” is sophomoric, and it would be hard to call it message responsible: The homophobic overtone of the speedwalker ad can’t be missed.

But it certainly breaks through, doesn’t it?

Would you consider this campaign responsible or not?

Comment below to weigh in.

. . .

UPDATE

Effective July 24, Mars pulled speedwalker ad.