Posts Tagged ‘youtube’

How Ford made me reconsider my auto buying habits

Wednesday, May 27th, 2009

I’ve owned dozens of cars, and like a lot of people, most have been Japanese or German. So when I turned in my leased Honda and started the hunt for a new hybrid, I drove the Toyota Prius, Camry and Highlander Hybrids, the new Honda Insight and a Lexus RX 400h.

  • The Prius felt underpowered
  • The Camry was nice, but felt too much like the Accord I’d just turned in
  • The Insight was loud and somewhat disappointing
  • And the Highlander Hybrid was so close in price to the Lexus, I chose the latter of the two

But the events of the last week have me second-guessing myself, and I have Ford’s social media marketing team (and a great product) to blame for it.

Let me explain.

A few weeks ago, Ford contacted me “looking for fresh perspectives and feedback, something a little more engaging and authentic” from “non-traditional approach for bloggers and other content creators” and asked if I’d be interested in test driving the new Fusion Hybrid for a few days.

I agreed, and last Thursday, they delivered a shiny new one to my office, with the Michigan “Manufacturer” plate and all.

Here are few pictures I snapped with my iPhone:

I drove the car to work, to the beach, to Costco, to a Mariners game. Basically everywhere.

The fit and finish were good and the ride was really quiet. In fact, it put my both my high-energy kids to sleep on the ride back from their grandma’s house. Sounds like a cliche, but it’s true.

I got a lot of comments from neighbors “That’s really a nice car,” co-workers “I’d buy that” and was even given a special parking spot by a parking lot attendant after he said “Is that the new Fusion Hybrid—cool!”

What I liked most was the fact I nearly forgot it was a hybrid. The transfer from electric to gas is less obvious than it is with my Lexus, a fact that the press hasn’t missed, with USA Today calling it the best gas-electric hybrid yet.

Oh, and while I didn’t get the 81.5 miles per gallon achieved in a recent hypermiling stunt, I did get a respectable 39.5 MPG in a mid-size car.

All-in-all, an eye-opening experience.

Ford’s social media team is firing on all cylinders

You might have heard the buzz about the Fiesta Movement, Ford’s social campaign that put 100 “agents” (selected from over 4,000 applicants) behind the wheel of a 2011 Ford Fiesta for six months and how they’re sharing the results of their “missions” on Facebook, Twitter, Flickr and YouTube.

Ford is winning on the social web due to the aggressive approach that Scott Monty and Ford’s social media team have been taking to engage customers and build authentic conversations around their products and brands.

A return to the past?

Their bet is that if people actually drive a Ford, they might buy one. In fact, Alan Mullaly, CEO of Ford, is interested in resurrecting “Have you driven a Ford lately?” campaign from the mid 1980’s.

Here’s an ad from that campaign that aired in 1984, the year I graduated from high school.

So, why didn’t I consider Ford?

Old attitudes and habits die hard.

Recent research from Nielsen puts Ford’s brand advocacy quotient below companies such as Kia, Pontiac and Chrysler.

While Ford’s branding and social media campaigns are good, I’ve become brand loyal to other manufacturers and it will take a lot to break that hold.

Ford’s dealers still publish absurdly noisy ads with prices the average buyer will seldom get (loyalty discounts, military discounts, first-time buyer discounts, etc)— and you’ll always have to haggle with the salesperson and expect them to bring in the manager when they can’t close the sale.

Still, that happens with most dealers and Ford’s product is good and worth a look.

People like me have been saying “Once American manufacturers catch up with Japanese and Germans, I’ll start buying American cars again.”

Well folks, has that time come? Ford’s product quality and the way they’re communicating with customers has me reconsidering their offerings.

Would you consider a Ford?

Comment below to weigh in.

Subscribe to this feed.

History’s worst viral campaign, or best?

Friday, June 13th, 2008

Above are two of four videos that were uploaded to YouTube two weeks ago proving that the radiation from cell phones is strong enough to actually pop corn.

Or not.

As it turns out, it’s a hoax—a viral marketing ploy by Cardo Systems, a maker of cell phone earpieces and headsets.

They’ve gained worldwide attention and have gone from a relative unknown to a poster child for viral campaigns.

Response has been mixed. Some are saying its brilliant and you can’t argue with it’s success. Others say it’s the Internet at its worst—it preys upon our collective fears in order to sell a product.

Even the Gawker Media Gossip Blog had this to say:

It would be satisfying to see this uncovered as history’s worst viral campaign.

Whether the makers of these videos realized it or not, by ‘proving’ an urban legend, these videos were Made to Stick.

What do you think, is this campaign responsible or not?

Comment below to weigh in.

Creativity + social networking = Zappos everywhere

Thursday, June 12th, 2008

Zappos, the online shoe and clothing retailer is popping up everywhere I go. In the last month, I’ve had a number of contacts with the company, none of them planned, and none of them through traditional marketing approaches.

Zappos is embracing social networking

I’m a fan of Twitter, the micro-blogging/social networking service, and so is Zappos. I kept stumbling upon tweets sent by members of the Zappos team, then someone shared this page with me:

That’s right, the company has created a special directory for any Zappos employee that wants to use Twitter.

Right now, 424 people are participating, including upper management and the CEO.

>>Follow me on Twitter.

Zappos let’s their people play

The company has created Zappos TV, a YouTube channel where you can find “sketches, behind-the-scenes excitement and yes, even music videos.”

I discovered the channel when someone sent me the following video:

Sure, most of these videos are the stuff you’d expect to find on YouTube, but it’s clear they’ve created a fun environment.

>>View the Responsible Marketing Channel on YouTube

Zappos is advertising in unconventional places

If you’ve flown anywhere lately, you know what I’m talking about.

Zappos has purchased advertising space in the bottom of the bins you put your shoes in as you move through security at the airport:

It’s brilliant placement because, well, they sell shoes, they have little competition, and air travelers tend to have more expendable income than people that don’t travel by plane.

Zappos is generating word of mouth

Considering the above, it’s no surprise people are talking about Zappos.

Personally, I first learned of the company when my neighbor’s twelve-year-old niece was cruising down the street in her Heely’s and I asked her where she got them.

“I got ‘em at Zappos, where else?” was her response.

‘Nuff said.

So, who else is doing a good job using creativity and/or social media to break through?

Comment below to share.

. . .

Photo of security tray: Communications Arts

SHIPOOPI! When bad ain’t so bad.

Monday, February 11th, 2008

“Remember to honk when you drive by Vern Fonk.”

If you live in Washington or Oregon you probably never thought you’d see that phrase here. Because while Vern Fonk offers commercial insurance, it’s known for its bargain basement advertising targeting tough-to-insure drivers—mostly on cable, often at night.

Their brand is low budget in all ways. Go to their website and you’ll see something straight out of WebsitesThatSuck.com. Bad Photoshop, typos, usability issues—you name it, the site has it.

So how did a company with marketing that’s so bad end up in the venerated pages of The Responsible Marketing Blog?

Well, somewhere along the way, Vern Fonk realized that with their target audience, schlocky sells. And instead of trying to upgrade their brand, they decided to have some fun and just go for it. Every ad is over the top and totally homespun, and some are actually entertaining:

They are doing a number of things right:

    • The ads are highly creative (in a sophomoric way)
    • They’ve bought plenty of media to raise and maintain awareness, in the right places at the right times
    • The ads are driving word-of-mouth
    • By being cartoonish, they are avoiding some scrutiny – it’s clear they are just having fun
    • They haven’t tried to class-up their ads—that would actually be off-brand

They have dozens of ads on YouTube, and most have received thousands of views. The ad above had been viewed over 100,000 times and was even spoofed by Fox12 News in Oregon:

The lesson here is that it doesn’t always take a huge budget to create marketing that works. It takes an understanding of your target audience, a ton of creativity, and the nerve to try something others won’t.

After all, everyone in the market knows Vern Fonk. And that ain’t so bad, is it?

What do you think?

Responsible Super Bowl ads? You decide.

Monday, February 4th, 2008

Football - Responsible Marketing Blog Super Bowl Ad Responsibility Poll

The Super Bowl frenzy is over, but the analysis of the Super Bowl advertising has just begun. Millions are already viewing and voting on their favorites at YouTube Adblitz and MySpace.

I’m interested in something a little different.

I’ve taken the liberty to list just over twenty of the ads that are currently receiving at least four stars on YouTube (yes, there were that many).

Which ads do you believe are most responsible?

What’s responsible? The ads should balance strategic, message and social responsibility. An ad can be strategic if it gets your attention and delivers the advertiser’s differentiation. It’s not responsible if it does it in a socially irresponsible way, or if it’s not message responsible.

Here’s the list:

[poll=2]

Comments? I’d love ‘em. Please post below.

Social networking in plain English (and the power of video)

Friday, February 1st, 2008

After wrapping up my article and post Social networking is ready for business. Are you? I remembered a video from a few years ago that explains what social networking is and its benefits. It’s only 1:47, so you can get through it quickly.

Explaining complex ideas with the written word takes a lot of energy for the writer and the full undivided attention of the reader. In less than two minutes, this little video explains with a level of detail that would take a minimum of 3,000 words and at least three detailed graphics.

It’s quite a testament to the power of video and I’d like to ask you, kind reader, where have you seen video used to help simplify a complicated idea. Please comment below to weigh in (links to actual videos encouraged).

Preview Pepsi’s Super Bowl ad for the deaf

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008

This ad from Pepsi will air during the Super Bowl.

Pepsi shows support for the deaf, makes sure advocacy groups will support them and then puts on what will be one of the most unique ads during the Super Bowl. Instead of participating in the advertising shouting contest, Pepsi zags and does an ad with no sound.

My only criticism: Too bad it didn’t reinforce Pepsi’s brand. In fact, at first I thought it was a Bud ad.

So, responsible or not? Comment below.

Super Bowl mania and the Lucy effect

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

Today is media day in Phoenix as a press contingent of 4,786 was on hand to ask the players everything from the intelligent (“how will you defend Randy Moss?”) to the inane (“what will you have for breakfast?”). It’s all news and apparently just about all of it is fit to print.

The Super Bowl isn’t just the best two teams in the NFL slugging it out. It’s the best the advertising industry has to offer. Well, at least for this target audience.

Wait, you say. Can a target audience be over 100 million people? Yep. If you’re target is the masses.

Remember the masses? Television used to reach ‘em back in the happy days of mass media. In fact, when I was a kid, if an advertiser bought time on “Happy Days” they’d hit a huge percentage of the market.

Before my time, the “I Love Lucy” show was so popular the water pressure would literally go down in major metropolitan areas during a commercial break. I call that the “Lucy effect.”

The Super Bowl is the only television program that comes close to that type of mass-market appeal. Consider this: a recent Retail Advertising & Marketing Association survey found that 36.3 percent of consumers will tune in . . . just to watch the commercials.

The formula for Super Bowl ads: make it funny. Or make it an epic. Then spend lots of money. This year, lots of money is $2.7 million for 30 seconds.

Is spending that much on a Super Bowl ad responsible? Sometimes. Super Bowl advertising has transcended mere advertising. The ads get equal time at the watercooler as the game does. The ads are now advertainment driving word-of-mouth–the most powerful form of marketing.

In the weeks leading up to the Super Bowl and following the game, a lot of attention is given to Super Bowl ads. Ads are rated, reviewed and commented upon on television, in print and online. That’s a lot of free impressions. Geez, I’m even going to have a poll here on the Responsible Marketing Blog – don’t miss it on Monday, 2/4.

So, with all this attention and this many people create a Lucy effect during this year’s game? Not likely. Remember, 36.3% of the people tuning in are watching for the ads.

But if it’s a blowout, we could see a reverse Lucy effect: the water pressure drops. . . after the ads.

Here’s an irresistible tie-in: Lucy doing a television commercial.

Super Bowl Advertising warm-up

Tuesday, January 22nd, 2008

Believe it or not, I used to actually require students in my Integrated Marketing Communications class the University of Washington to watch the Super Bowl…for the ads.

In the coming weeks I’ll be touching on television advertising a little more than usual, and on February 3rd, I’ll conduct an anonymous poll listing all the main ads for your feedback.

As a warm-up, I’ll list two automobile ads I love (and why I love them) that have aired on the Super Bowl or are “Super Bowl” worthy. Here they are:

Honda’s Rube Goldberg Machine
Filmed in one shot with no CGI or special effects of any kind, this fascinating two minute video uses parts from a Honda Accord as part of a Rube Goldberg-esque machine that will leave you saying, “there’s no way they could have done that without special effects.”

When this ad came out a few years ago, it was forwarded to me a half dozen times in the first week of it release. And I know I shared it with at least two dozen of my friends in the business.

The Renault Ballet

You’ve seen cars doing ballet. You’ve seen it in the desert. But you’ve never seen it quite like this.

This video has been downloaded nearly a half million times in about four months and is heavily commented upon on YouTube.
Oh, and in case you are wondering, the phrase “Das sicherste ensemble der welt” loosely means, “safest ensemble of the world.”

Why do I love these ads? They are creative, captivating and they are driving conversation. And that, my friends, is a very good thing.

Stay tuned for more fun with Super Bowl advertising.

Can subliminal advertising be responsible?

Friday, January 18th, 2008

We’ve all seen examples of subliminal advertising in print ads over the years. I use the word “seen” loosely, because usually you have to look pretty hard to find that suggestive image that’s supposed to burrow itself into your subconscious and get you to buy! buy! buy!

Anyway, subliminal advertising on television is a whole different story. Freeze the action on the correct frame and boom! subliminal is now perceptible.

Here’s a subliminal ad discovered on The Food Network last year:

I’m lovin’ it.

Well, not so much. Like most people, I don’t want to be manipulated. But also because for years now, just about every academic study done on the topic has concluded that subliminal advertising doesn’t work.

Maybe I shouldn’t care.

After all, what good is subliminal advertising if it doesn’t work and it runs the risk of making people feel violated? Let’s answer that after you view this:

No, this isn’t subliminal advertising, though the person that posted it on YouTube thought it might be.

Mad Men, the critically-acclaimed AMC series from the writer and Executive Producer of The Sopranos is all about deception, lies, and the dark side of advertising. The tagline is “Where the truth lies.”

Call me mad, but AMC didn’t go far enough with this. They consider a significant prime time subliminal advertising campaign.

Here’s my rationale:

  • The story is set during an era when subliminal advertising was a hot topic and top-of-mind with the American public
  • Don Draper, the “Tony Soprano” of the series would have used these tactics
  • The PR and word-of-mouth they would receive would be tremendous
  • And they have the perfect defense: subliminal advertising doesn’t work anyway, does it?

    Is subliminal advertising ever responsible? In most cases, absolutely not. It’s not message or ROI responsible.

    But I’d consider it one of the most responsible ways to promote MadMen.

    What do you think?